• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

The NO vote is the classic example of the fallacy of that logic. President Obama, in his self-congratulatory last speech to the UN, proclaimed that we "helped Colombia end Latin America's longest struggle." The logic of this bizarre argument went that were it not for the navy debilitation of the guerrillas due to the U.S.-Colombian military alliance, the FARC may never have been dropped at the negotiating desk. The blood spilled on its soil feeds the global war machine, to such an extent that Colombia has been groomed as an exporter of counterinsurgency and "security" training, despite its repute as a gross violator of human rights and the disastrous humanitarian affect of its prolonged struggle. He says he needs to evolve the human race. With U.S. navy theorists overtly calling for reopening hostilities, it is a dangerous myth to assume that at this juncture everybody desires peace and the one open question is the way to do it. To pretend that everyone wants peace and the one subject is tips on how to get it is to ignore the fact that the conflict benefits many powerful interests. War can be an enormous enterprise. Army War College, though it's not an official document, openly expresses relief on the continuation of indefinite struggle in Colombia.

Thanks to U.S. Plan Colombia and policies that fanned the conflict, Colombia turned the third largest recipient of U.S. The battle justified Plan Colombia, the $10 billion dollar counterinsurgency and counternarcotics plan that allowed the Pentagon to establish a army presence in Colombia, both bodily and by proxy. Our goal has at all times been to provide a professional, friendly and honest service the place our shoppers get top greenback deals. Top administration officials began preparing the Pentagon to go anywhere and do something, whereas rewriting, shredding, or ignoring whatever legal guidelines, national or worldwide, stood in the way in which. Colombia's warfare since Plan Colombia started in 2000 -- signifies that there is a harmful risk of a provocation to further undermine the peace course of that has now been thrown into disaster by the NO vote. Plan Colombia for making peace doable. Billions of dollars have been poured into Plan Colombia and national security investments that ended up within the pockets of political elites and U.S. Plan Colombia and its later incarnations stored U.S. The conflict fomented by Plan Colombia constructed up a mentality that made peace an unacceptable resolution for a lot of. The U.S. navy-industrial complicated also has a vested curiosity in persevering with the battle.

Before the NO vote, the U.S. Bernard Aronson, the special envoy to the peace talks, expressed no regret in a press interview after the vote, stating, "We consider Colombians want peace, but clearly they are divided about phrases of settlement." The State Department limited its statement to help for Colombian democracy and additional dialogue. Some voters additionally apparently believed that four years of arduous negotiations with the technical help of scores of worldwide specialists and mediators might merely be reopened and "fastened" to their liking, although Santos made it clear there was "no Plan B." Some NO voters quoted within the press even expressed dismay that they'd gained, believing they have been merely casting a protest vote. Additionally it is probably that many people did not have a clear understanding of the accords or their implications, which is a failing of the negotiators and SI (yes) promoters that left a fatal opening for NO propaganda. For many people caught in bitter partisan politics, to vote for peace was to vote in favor of the latter. Those that promote peace and reconciliation in the nation should deal with that mentality head on.

This is the patriarchal mentality that the warfare trade thrives on. On the political front, conflict assures army control over a population and justifies authoritarianism and repression by way of fear. Within the budgets for fiscal years 2010-2017, the United States allotted over $2 billion in navy and police aid -- most of that throughout the peace talks. Israel and Egypt. Colombia's finances for safety forces skyrocketed; between 2001 and 2005, it grew greater than 30 p.c, and by 2006 it was double its 1990 levels -- some $4.48 billion for military and police. With the pretext of Colombia's inside conflict, the U.S. The comparative train requires us to calculate the real GDP (absent inflation) and achieve this in U.S. Consequently, rising markets throughout the world - and the food sector سعر الدولار اليوم في البنك الأهلي المصري specifically - are affected by rising inflation. We had begun even to talk of the inflation brought about by issues of paper money, by increasing struggle loans, and by inflowing gold. Along with Uribe followers who seen it as comfortable on the FARC, the war financial system of the nation and its ally, the United States, was at stake. It represented the suitable towards the left, and Uribe against Santos.

Here is more information regarding سعر الدولار اليوم في البنك الأهلي المصري review the internet site.